Polling analyst calls it "unfathomable" that Poilievre could lose.
How is it that a political scientist (Gill) didn't know Carney wouldn't be progressive, whereas I, just some moderately educated and observant schmuck, somehow figured out that a banker would serve corporate interests at the expense of taxpayers?
How is it that a political scientist (Gill) didn't know Carney wouldn't be progressive, whereas I, just some moderately educated and observant schmuck, somehow figured out that a banker would serve corporate interests at the expense of taxpayers?